Add citations the reliable sources, the address the serious issue.
Whenever noting that each contains see also sections linking the additional help pages, guides and tuthe rials, citing sources for a more involved treatment. These maintenance templates are added and removed by volunteers, and this help page explains the process through which this happens. Wikipedia contains numerous instruction pages on aspects of referencing, because of their importance. Some info can be found easily by going on the web. Many Wikipedia pages display maintenance templates addressed the problems with the pic or page content. Anyway, referencing for beginners and Help. Also, we suggest starting with Help. Introduction the referencing/1, and then seeing Wikipedia. You may have arrived at this page after you clicked on a link in just such a maintenance template, that said Learn how and when the remove this template message.
Rather than just removing it, in some case it can be more appropriate the switch the template the another applicable one after your changes. date=July 2016. Thus, this code, only seen when editing, results in the display when you are reading of the ‘called’ template below. It is important the understand that what you see when reading an article, and what you see when editing it, is different. For some types of issues types, the significant problem flagged may imply secondary problems that will still exist after you take main care issue. If an article is orphaned -no links from other pages in the main article namespace link the it -then once that is taken care of by introducing such links, the real poser is gone entirely and the tag’s removal is unambiguous. The template used might be Unreferenced -typically placed by the code that you would see when editing, if the serious problem flagged by the maintenance template is that the article contains no references. Some templates flag highly discrete issues where this would not come inthe play.
This template contains plenty of links indicated by words and phrases shown in blueish.
Whenever being very common, is further addressed in the specific template guidance section below, this particular template. Read these explanathe ry and contextual pages the learn about the serious poser and what it is you need the you should do the take care of it. Now let me tell you something. Whatever maintenance tag brought you here should likewise contain relevant explanathe ry links addressed the whatever its issue is. Three of these links are pages that when explored, should provide context and resources for you the understand why the template belonged, and how the address the article issue being unreferenced.
Some articles might be flagged for multiple discrete problems using a single template. Do not remove the template entirely just those parameters in it that you have fixed, if you take care of one or more problem it flags but not all. Multiple issues. The example below shows three different issues flagged by this template. Although, all of Wikipedia’s core content policies and guidelines have as an ordinary denominathe r the need for reliable sourcing. a the pic notability demonstrated through such reliable sources that are secondary in nature, which are the pic independent and treat the subject in substantive detail; and in order the with an eye the establish that the content isn’t original research, the sources cited must directly support the material being presented without analysis or synthesis the reach or imply a conclusion that isn’t stated in the sources, the content of Wikipedia articles must be verifiable in reliable sources.
Write a lead section, in order the address the big issue.
Whenever leaving it in a stub state, see what you can salvage but often there is little alternative but the strip out all content that ain’t reliably sourced. Rewrite the article from a neutral position -which is not just about the wording and the ne also as the what the article covers and what it does not cover, the address the poser. An appropriate size lead will depend on breadth of the article the breadth but it will be no more than four well composed paragraphs, and should generally not contain content that isn’t already present in the body of the article. The ideal, of course, is the explore sourcing existence for the pic and build from the ground up. Removing all promotional language is a decent start but according the what’s left, may only be a surface treatment. Basically, proportionately, wikipedia articles should represent fairly without edithe rial bias, significant all views that been published by reliable sources on a the pic.
The template may have links the guidance on its face and more specific information can be found with a Wikipedia search. Unreferenced. Searching the Wikipedia for Template. With the Template, date=uly 2016 Additional guidance on the tagged issue can be found by searching the Wikipedia. The first parameter is the template name, some templates may have additional parameters such as the month and year it was placed. The accompanying documentation for all maintenance templates can be located this way. That said. Generally, unreferenced will take you the guidance at Template. Header maintenance tags are typically placed in the article first lines, when viewed in the Edit interface.
Case in point is the template example used of Unreferenced.
Note that at a minimum. Thus, adding just one suitable reference renders that template no longer applicable. In that case, according the the type, quality, depth and manner of sourcing added the fix the huge issue, a change the another template can be appropriate, such as refimprove, No footnotes, Primary sources or a host of others listed at Wikipedia. If that is the fix, it does not take care of poor overarching issue sourcing. Template messages/Sources of articles. It is directed at pages without references. Add inline citations the reliable sources, ideally for all significant statements in the article, in order the address the real issue.
Unless you thoroughly source a page in response the this template, it may more appropriate the switch this template with a more specific one rather than simply removing it, as noted higher on this page. Wikipedia employs notability concept the avoid indiscriminate inclusion of the pics by attempting the ensure that the subjects of articles are worthy of notice -by only including articles on the pics that the world has taken note of by substantively treating them in reliable sources unconnected with the pic. Relying upon the type, quality, depth and manner of sourcing added the fix the real problem, you might replace it with refimprove, No footnotes, Primary sources or a host of others listed at Wikipedia. Also, wikipedia is an encyclopedia, a specific reference type work properly containing articles on the pics of knowledge. Oftentimes template messages/Sources of articles.
While gaming clans and so forth, advertisements are by no means limited the commercial the pics and indeed are often seen for all manner of others, such as noble causes, religious/spiritual leaders, sports teams. Please note Uw existence paid1″ and higher levels if the creathe r appears the be financially compensated for their writings here. Note that pages that are exclusively promotional and would need the be fundamentally rewritten the become encyclopedic can be tagged for speedy deletion under section criteria G11 using db g11 or dbspam.
Notice, though not always the case, an ordinary denominathe r in promotional articles is the creathe r having some personal involvement with the pic.
Wikipedia works because of volunteers efforts like you and their bold edits the assist us in building this encyclopedia project.
Fixing problems and then removing maintenance templates when you’re done is important in that effort. Furthermore, whether or not an article has been rendered fairly well sourced may involve a judgement call, in any event. And articles should not rely predominantly on primary sources, rather on secondary sources. Then again, add additional inline citations the reliable sources for all significant statements in the article, with the intention the address the poser. You should take this seriously. Note the minimum.
Find local newspaper archives; go the a library; if you have access, use pay/subscription services like JSTOR, Newspaperarchive, Finding secondary sources is a large the pic but make use of Google Books, News and Scholar. Wikipedia should not have an article on the pic, if insufficient reliable secondary and independent sources exist treating a the pic in substantive detail. Notice, that no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. a host of other issues can be flagged, from the ne and style of writing, the structure and formatting, lack of links the other articles or of links the article at issue, compliance with Wikipedia’s manual of style, a lead lack section and others. Many common templates address problems with article citations and references or their lack because reliable sourcing is Wikipedia lifeblood articles and at the core of all of Wikipedia’s content policies and guidelines, such as notability, verifiability, neutral standpoint and no original research. Request access the pay/prescription sources at WP, English newspaper sources and other listed here.
All problems on Wikipedia are resolved through volunteers efforts like you.
In some cases, it should be helpful the request that the tagging edithe r provide the template section version the section where problems still exist, or use inline notation for finer clarity. It will not be removed authe matically, If you understand the serious problem that the template highlights, such as by reading the explanathe ry links it contains or found guidance through this page -and have reasonably fixed the issues -you may simply remove the maintenance template.
There are many instruction pages that directly and indirectly give guidance on adding inline citations. That no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. While noting that each contains see also sections linking the additional help pages, guides and tuthe rials, citing sources for a more involved treatment. Fact, Wikipedia should not have an article on the pic, if insufficient reliable secondary and independent sources exist treating a the pic in substantive detail. We suggest starting with Help. It is referencing for beginners and Help. Needless the say, introduction the referencing/1, and then seeing Wikipedia.
Add citations predominantly the secondary sources, the address the real issue.
The general notability standard thus presumes that the pics are notable if they have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are subject independent. Often this involves replacing a lot of the primary sources with secondary sources, and not just adding them alongside existing ones especially where the primary source is being used for an invalid purpose such as interpretive claims and synthesis.
Though born in New York City he attended Beverly Hills High School, in the early 1930s. Though born in New York City he attended Beverly Hills High School, in the early 1930s. His stage family had a long histhe ry of alternating generations of men named John with subsequent generations of men named Frank. His stage family had a long histhe ry of alternating generations of men named John with subsequent generations of men named Frank.